Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP) are two integral technologies that have shaped the manufacturing industry over the past few decades.

While they share some commonalities, their key differences lie in their scope and implementation. Of course, understanding these distinctions can empower manufacturers to leverage the full potential of their operations and clear the termenolgy used by ERP consultant firms. 

MRP emerged in the 1960s as a scheduling system to manage dependencies in the production process.

It enabled manufacturers to calculate material requirements accurately while factoring in lead times and ensuring the availability of components for assembly.

MRP provided visibility into forecasting, inventory control, and production planning. However, it was limited to manufacturing capacities and did not integrate other business functions.

ERP systems, which started to gain popularity in the 1990s, took MRP capabilities to the next level.

They unified business processes across departments—from supply chain, accounting, and HR to customer relations. ERP created a central database for real-time data sharing across an organization.

While MRP focuses solely on production planning, ERP delivers an integrated suite covering all aspects of operations, and that can be seen easily in plastforms such as Microsoft Dynamics 365. 

Over time, ERP has evolved into a strategic tool to streamline processes and reduce costs company-wide.

MRP vs ERP: The Differences

Several fundamental differences exist between MRP and ERP systems:

Scope

• MRP is confined solely to manufacturing activities such as production scheduling, capacity planning, bill of materials, and shop floor control. Its scope is limited to the factory floor and plant operations.
• ERP has a much broader scope that spans all core business processes across departments like finance, recruitment, supply chain, inventory, customer relations, and manufacturing. ERP integrates data and workflows across the entire enterprise.

Integration

• MRP works independently of other organizational systems and does not offer native integration capabilities. It functions as a stand-alone manufacturing application.
• ERP provides seamless integration between various business functions through a unified database and common interfaces. This enables cross-functional data sharing and process orchestration.

Data

• MRP uses data mainly from production schedules and bills of materials to manage manufacturing activities. This data has limited business context.
• ERP leverages a central data repository that is updated in real-time across the enterprise. This provides comprehensive real-time visibility and analytical capabilities.

Customization

• MRP systems allow only limited customization to adapt to unique business requirements beyond base manufacturing functionalities.
• ERP systems are highly customizable with capabilities to tailor systems and workflows to meet specialized needs.

Planning

• MRP is focused on production planning activities like materials forecasting, inventory control, shop floor scheduling, and optimizing plant capacity.
• ERP facilitates long-term strategic enterprise planning across financials, human resources, inventory, supply chain, sales, product development, and manufacturing operations.

Cost

• MRP software is relatively inexpensive with licenses costing under 10.000 US dollars. It has lower infrastructure requirements.
• ERP solutions require greater investment with large-scale implementations costing over 20.000 US dollars including licenses, infrastructure, customization, and integrations. However, the ERP system provided by Microsoft is cheap to adopt. There are also free versions and open-source systems.

Complexity

• MRP systems have relatively simple interfaces, menus, and workflows focused on production users. Training requirements are modest.
• ERP systems are inherently more complex to learn and use with intricate workflows, vast menus, and configuration options. They require greater training and expertise.

MRP vs ERP: The Similarities

While MRP and ERP have fundamental differences, they also share some common capabilities:

Optimizing Resources

• Both MRP and ERP aim to optimize manufacturing resource utilization including inventory, workers, machines, tools, plant capacities, and more through careful planning and scheduling.
• They minimize wastage and inefficiencies by assigning resources precisely when and where needed based on production plans.

Improving Efficiency

• MRP and ERP reduce costs and enhance productivity through streamlined processes, accurate tracking, and real-time visibility into manufacturing operations.
• They minimize redundancies and speed up operations by orchestrating workflows.

Bill of Materials (BoM)

• They both rely heavily on a Bill of Materials (BoM) for defining, organizing, and tracking component requirements in the production process.
• The BoM is integral to materials planning, inventory management, and production scheduling in both systems.

Inventory Management

• MRP and ERP support effective management of raw material inventories by considering stock levels, lead times, reorder points, and supplier requirements.
• They optimize inventory holding and purchasing while avoiding stock-outs.

Production Scheduling

• They both schedule plant activities, production runs, and shop floor operations based on priorities, demand forecasts, resource availability, materials supply, and other constraints.

Reporting

• MRP and ERP provide reporting features and data analytics to track key production KPIs, metrics, and dashboards for insights into manufacturing performance.
• This supports decision-making and continuous improvement.

MRP vs ERP: The Costs

The costs of MRP and ERP can vary significantly:

• Software acquisition: ERP licenses tend to cost over $100K+ for full suites from vendors like SAP and Oracle. MRP software pricing starts under $10K.
• Implementation: ERP implementations with integration services can cost over $1 million for large enterprises. MRP implementation costs less than $100K typically.
• Maintenance: ERP maintenance costs run upward of 20% of license fees annually. MRP annual fees are under $25K.
• Training: ERP requires training across departments, which can cost tens of thousands. MRP training is simpler and cheaper.
• Customization: Highly customizable ERP systems require expensive IT resources. MRP customization is inexpensive.
• Upgrades: ERP upgrades can run into millions for large systems. MRP upgrades are quicker and cheaper.

Alternatives to MRP & ERP

Aside from MRP and ERP, other options exist:

• Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES): MES focuses on factory floor execution and integrates with ERP data. It is less robust than ERP but more granular than MRP.
• Inventory Management Systems: Standalone systems just for inventory planning and warehouse management. They offer focused capabilities.
• Point Solutions: Highly specialized solutions like e-procurement, HRMS, etc. that can integrate with ERP or work independently.
• Cloud-based solutions: Cloud solutions like NetSuite provide lower-cost options to traditional on-premises ERP with greater agility.

Each option has its own fit depending on business requirements. Small manufacturers may find MRP or cloud solutions more budget-friendly, while large enterprises benefit from full-fledged ERP capabilities. The ERP vs MRP decision requires assessing trade-offs strategically.

Final Thought

While MRP laid the early foundations for production planning, ERP has evolved into a cutting-edge solution unifying global business functions. ERP enables process orchestration using real-time data across departments and locations.

It empowers strategic decision-making and forecasting with integrated financials, HR, inventory, and customer data. For large, diversified manufacturers, ERP is becoming an indispensable investment despite its complexity and costs.

However, for many small manufacturers, MRP still provides adequate capabilities for production planning at affordable prices.

Cloud-based solutions are also lowering the barriers to modern ERP adoption. In summary, ERP brings more benefits but also requires greater resources.

Denarjes offers a roadmap for those looking to adopt CRM and ERP systems. You can contact us right away to explore your options.

Frequently Asked Questions